Showing posts with label dior. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dior. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

making faces :: coral crazy

this would look awesome on your face
if you follow [as opposed to simply "wear"] cosmetics, you'll undoubtedly have heard the word coral more times than you thought you would in your lifetime. it seems like for the last year, everything has been coral- lips, cheeks, eyes, hair... ok, i'm kidding about the hair, but everything else has definitely had a coral tinge. so what's the big deal?

well, part of it is that people who make colour cosmetics want to keep feeding that desire to grab what's new, what's happening right now as opposed to three months ago, which is undoubtedly no longer cool. but the powers that be said that about black lips a couple of years back too and while people flocked to try it out, most stopped at the trying stage and the fad went away [except in my case, since i've always liked that sort of hard futuristic edge that comes from black lips, as opposed to dark red or purple]. but you say "coral" in front of makeup fans and immediately they're like zombies, pelting the contents of their wallets at you and saying "more".

MORE!



first things first. what colour is coral, exactly? i'm glad you asked [not that you did, but i'd have been glad if you had asked, just so you know]. defining coral actually helps in understanding its popularity. although corals in nature can be any of a wide variety of colours, they are most often known for being a shade that mixes orange, red and pink in more or less equal measure. the proper colour "coral" is a medium-light orange with a touch of pink, a touch that makes it a little cooler [as in colour temperature, not as in hip], but there are variations on that shade which run the gamut from light to dark, some leaning more orange, some more red and some, you guessed it, more pink. it's an odd situation where a colour at once references something fairly specific and yet has a range within it. saying that something is coral is more specific, for instance, than saying it's "green", but there's still room for interpretation.

within that range, though, you are essentially dealing with tones that are very flattering on skin. the pink element keeps shades from being too warm. the orange keeps them from being too cool. so as a result, there aren't too many skin types that can't wear coral. those same elements also mean that it's less stark than a true, primary red, even when it's a fairly bright shade. and it's more original than pink, which has been around forever and can't really be expected to carry the burden of being an "it" colour. once again, for a shade that seems offbeat or hard to pin down, it's actually a pretty easy thing to carry off. easier than the black lips, at least.

here are a few things i've done incorporating corals [which have snuck into my cosmetic wardrobe despite the fact that i try not to buy trendy things... it's just so damn easy to wear].

"toxic tale"
last fall, mac introduced "toxic tale" lipstick as part of their disney villains collection. it sold out roughly three days before most people knew it existed, which is kind of a frustrating thing about mac's limited editions. the good news is that they do bring popular colours back, so i have every confidence that if you missed this one the first time, you'll have another opportunity. and since it's coral, i wouldn't be surprised if that opportunity came pretty quickly. the coral colour i used on my eyes was also a limited shade from earlier this year, but mac does have a permanent shade called "electric coral" [available at pro stores, or you can order it over the phone] which is fairly similar and lives up to its name.


face ::
nars sheer glow foundation "mont blanc"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"
mac mineralize skinfinish natural "light"

eyes ::
mac e/s "dazzlelight"
mac pigment "pink opal"
mac pigment "follow your fancy"
mac eye kohl "fascinating"
mac fluidline eye liner "blacktrack"
ysl faux cils mascara

cheeks ::
mac blush "bite of an apple"

lips ::
mac l/s "toxic tale"



"ever hip"
this shade would be an example of something that mac has already brought back. it debuted last spring and sold out, so they brought it back again this year as part of their "fashion flower" spring collection. in fact, the blush- another coral shade- was also a repeat performer this year, having popped up a couple of years back in a limited edition. both of these are super-soft, understated corals, easy to wear and very safe for people who don't want anything too vibrant. or, alternately, they make a nice counterpoint for when you want to do something really intense with your eyes. greens and corals seem made for each other, as a rule. not that there are rules, but, if there were, that one would make sense.

face ::
nars sheer glow foundation "mont blanc"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"

eyes ::
nars soft touch shadow pencil "celebrate" [as a base on the inner part of the eye]
mac fluidline eye liner "ivy" [as a base on the outer part of the eye]
mac e/s "sharp"
ysl e/s "slate green"
ysl faux cils mascara

cheeks ::
mac beauty powder "alpha girl"

lips ::
mac l/s "ever hip"



"hibiscus"
this lipstick is an example of the red end of coral. [is it me, or does that sound nasty?] the shade has very little pink to it at all, but it's a little softer and more restrained than a full-on red. this is a great shade for summer, which is, i suppose, why mac came out with it as part of their summer collection this year. if you blinked and missed it [again, it sold out practically before it went on sale], the good faeries have told me that there will be a shade that looks awfully similar coming out at mac in the first week in august. when a colour is hot, cosmetic companies tend to want to take advantage of it as much as they can.

face ::
nars sheer glow foundation "mont blanc"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"

eyes ::
inglot e/s "351"
mac e/s "skintone 2"
mac e/s "jealousy wakes"
nars e/s "night porter"
diorshow mascara

cheeks ::
mac blush "mighty aphrodite"

lips ::
mac l/s "hibiscus"

Sunday, June 12, 2011

making faces :: product review [stila, benefit]

thought i'd take the opportunity of a truly miserable sunday afternoon [is it just me or does bad weather seem a lot worse when it happens on sunday?] to give some quick [for me] thoughts on a couple of things i've picked up lately, one new to the market, one just new to me.












stila sparkle eye liner "curacao"
this is a brand that i've wanted to try for a while, starting chiefly from the fact that my first exposure to them came from seeing their name on early iterations of companies that don't perform animal testing. while it's a lot easier to find companies who meet that criteria nowadays, i was still always interested to see what stila did. it's just that i could never find them. for whatever reason, their products never seemed to be on sale any place i could actually get to. reluctant to make my first experience an online exchange, i waited and was recently rewarded when i went into murale and found that the lise watier display had been uprooted in favour of a shiny new stila one. [smart move on their part- watier is available everywhere in montreal, whereas this is the only location in the downtown area that has stila.

i was a blank slate, having no idea where to even start with the brand, so i was surprised when what really caught my eye was a bright blue sparkly liquid liner called "curacao". i say surprised because i'm not normally much for eye liner in any colour other than black and, in particular, blue is a colour i tend to avoid since i find it makes my actual eye colour look faded. it's just that this one looked some damn pretty and so damn unique compared to just about anything else on display. the colour when i tried it on the back of my hand was intense and i figured that, if i was going to try something new, i might as well go all the way new. and as it turns out, these particular liquid liners are new to stila as well.



curacao sparkle liner
the formula on these is fairly watery- i found that on my eye [where i'm not inclined to push down with tremendous force], i needed a couple of coats to build up the intensity. i also found this meant that it took a few seconds to really properly set. the good aspect of that is that if you make a mistake, you can just wipe it away and it's like nothing happened. the bad part is that you need a little patience applying or else you're going to have smudges all over your lids. once set, the staying power is great. it doesn't budge and it maintains its intensity of colour, which is probably one of the main reasons people choose liquid liners to begin with.

the reason people tend to avoid liquid liners is because they can be really, really finicky and messy to apply. however with these, that's not so much the case. aside from the fact that you can clear away an "oops" pretty quickly, the long, conical applicator gives you a great deal of control over where the product goes and is not prone to dripping where you don't want it. i found the application smooth, even and neat, despite having to layer the product to get the intensity i wanted.

that layering is actually my biggest problem with these liners [or at least with the one i've tried]. the applicator makes it easier to do, but to me, trying to line up layers of eye liner is just asking for problems. once i did get the colour where i wanted it, though, i do have to say that it's very beautiful. i love the way it shimmers when it catches the light and adds just a flash of blue to my eyes. that effect can be more subtle when worn with other colours, or could be more dramatic if used on its own against a nude/ neutral base.

there are eight shades available of the sparkle liners. i would characterise them as "standards"- black, brown, olive, purple, blue and teal for colour. curacao is more original- more of a royal blue than a cyan base and a sort of ultraviolet reflect. there is also a mauve-grey ["starry"] that looks a little more distinctive than most dark grey shades available.

stile sparkle liners are $22usd/ $30cad, which puts them firmly on my s**t list for currency gouging, but the product is nice enough to warrant giving a try to whichever colours grabs your fancy.

available from sephora and murale [canada]. 

benefit full-finish lipstick "mod squad"
oh benefit, i so want to love you, with your slyly humourous marketing and your highly specialised products designed to meet needs i didn't realise i had, but we just never quite seem to connect. i'm extremely glad to see that the california-based company who celebrate both femininity and feminine power have grown to such a success and i still believe that their "bad gal" mascara is something to which all other mascaras secretly aspire [which makes me wonder why they've launched a new one this summer], but i just seem to have very little luck using their products myself.

their "high beam" highlighter is a beautiful, moonlit shade, but it settles in my pores something wicked. "dr. feelgood" priming balm makes my skin feel like velvet, but after a few days' use, it has a tendency to make me break out. their "creaseless cream" shadows work far better on me than most creams, but i still find they leave my lids feeling "sweaty" and can irritate the corners of my eyes [although they're not nearly so irritating as the mac "big bounce" shadows]. i keep going back to them because i love their attitude, their products are inventive enough to keep me interested and both "bad gal" and their ubiquitous boxed blushes are standouts.

their lipstick crossed my path when i had a hankering for a summer version of a lighter, cooler pink, something a little less heavy than mac's "saint germain" and a little more neutral than guerlain's "fuchsia delice". "mod squad" fit the bill quite nicely, because, despite the name invoking visions of opaque sixties white-pink kissers, the shade is quite sheer and, while definitely a cooler nude pink, it reads as quite natural with a single pass.

it surprises me that this is listed as a "full finish" lipstick, since i find the formula to be quite light. while it's not sheer, the colour of my lips definitely pokes through a little. if i layer the colour [which brings it closer to that light, cool "mod pink"], this becomes more pronounced, since the colour of my lips "fights" with the colour of the lipstick. personally, i didn't like the effect of the lipstick once it was layered- it seemed to apply very unevenly and the formula is slippery enough that it becomes more uneven every time your lips move. as a light, fairly sheer shade, i liked it very much, so whether or not this is the colour for you may depend largely on what you want to get from it.

mod squad- the cat hair is simon's touch
the formula, as i mentioned, is very moist/ slippery, almost more like a gloss. very strangely, although the colour itself doesn't have any shimmer or frost i can discern, there is a fine "grittiness" i can feel on my lips. i can't imagine why that would be the case or why someone wouldn't fix it, because it feels like you've got dust or dirt on your mouth. if you can get used to that, or learn to ignore it, the formula is quite moisturising and i did feel like my lips were getting some benefit from that. [i'll give you a moment to groan.] being a pretty emollient texture and a lighter colour, it's not a long-lasting shade; i would say i could get two hours or so of wear [assuming i could stop pleating my lips trying to figure out the grittiness] without having to reapply. based on what i've red, lipsticks in general seem to last less time on me than on others, so your mileage may vary.

there are definitely things that i like about this shade and some of the things i don't like, i can forgive because they're not as noticeable in a light/ sheer colour as they would be on the kind of colour i normally wear. but, once again, it seems that benefit and i are just doomed to be a little bit out of synch.

benefit full-finish lipstick is available in 20 permanent shades. $18usd/ $22cad [gets a slight growl, but canadian customers can order directly from benefit's web site].

available at sephora, murale, select shopper's drug mart/ pharmaprix locations and on line from www.benefitcosmetics.com

here's a quick look incorporating both products.


face
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"
mac mineralize skinfinish natural "light"

eyes
mac e/s "neutral pink"
mac e/s "prussian"
mac megametal e/s "prance"
stila sparkle eye liner "curacao"
diorshow mascara

cheeks
mac mineralize skinfinish "pink power"

lips
benefit full-finish lipstick "mod squad"

nails [visible above, so i figured i'd share]
nars "desperado"

Thursday, June 2, 2011

making faces :: product review [christian dior]

it's strange, because as much as i know that dior is still a home of haute couture, they're cosmetic marketing increasingly leaves me thinking of the girl hanging out with the chi-chi crowd who doesn't quite belong. unlike the more refined collections of chanel or guerlain- who should be their haute couture contemporaries- dior cosmetics always seem very much a thing of the modern world, always pushing the edge and leading the way. it's a strange position for them to be in and one that i'm never certain befits their exalted status. while everything that they release seems very pretty and often incredibly useful [no one has nicer shadow combinations than the ones that are available in their ready-made quints], they seem to lack the sort of classic refinement that the aforementioned natural competitors have.

the advantage to being the haute couture cousin least saddled with traditional baggage is that you have the opportunity to come up with things that are innovative and exciting while the other girls are busy trying to live up to their own billing.



dior has been doing a lot of reinventing lately, most noticeably with its completely new line of "dior addict" lipsticks- a semi-sheer but colour-saturated formula that stands as the younger, cheekier and cheaper counterpart to their "rouge dior" lipsticks [which tend to be more opaque, more intense and are, of course, more expensive]. i personally haven't tried the new dior addict lipsticks, other than on my hand, because i haven't found a shade that's exactly me [or, i should say, a shade that's exactly me that i don't already have in another form].  but i have been trying a couple of other goodies from dior and, while they're not necessary the most dramatic thing a girl could own, they're the kind of things that every girl should own.


what's she concealing?
dior skin perfecting hydrating concealer :: well, my skin isn't perfect yet, but in the interests of getting a review out before i die, i figured i should just state what i think.

lest you think that concealer is one of those things that's just a nice add-on if you happen to have a few extra pennies, let me point something out: everything that is wrong with your complexion, everything that bothers you about your appearance, insofar as it can be fixed, can be fixed with concealer and most likely nothing else. think about it. what do you dislike about your face? lines? dark under-eye circles? uneven colour? all these things are things you want to conceal, hence, concealer will deal with them. foundations may give you a decent base and colour cosmetics will distract, but concealer, whether used on its own or mixed with a moisturiser [you are using some type of lotion on your skin every day, right?], will help disguise all those horrific imperfections that only you have.

nekkid
personally, i have a difficult relationship with concealers. and by difficult, i mean i tend to hate the bloody things with every fibre of my being because now that i realise why they're important to keeping up appearances, i'm forced to constantly be on the lookout for one that works for me. and i have to say that the main thing that drew me to dior was nothing more than the fact that they're shade 001 "ivory" seemed to match my colour fairly well.

i found the formula for this quite light and almost mousse-like compared to other concealers i've tried. the upside to that is that it doesn't have a tendency to collect in in the skin around my eyes. the downside is that the colour saturation is lighter and one generally wears concealer in areas where coverage is important.

diorskin concealer under the eyes
strangely, the lighter texture doesn't seem to especially equate to lighter coverage. while it didn't completely obscure the ravages of age and sleeplessness, i did find that this concealer did a stand-up job of making everything look smooth and balanced, even when i wasn't wearing much else in the way of base makeup. some under-eye discolouration still appeared, but it's noticeably reduced.

where i find this stuff shines [metaphorically] is in its hydrating properties. whereas most concealers simply offer a fairly thick cover and then sit on the skin, this one penetrates deep enough to soften the epidermal layer, which means that annoying things like crows' feet are diminished in appearance. the effect overall is very natural, which i like, since i normally find that concealers tend to be very thick and to end up pressed into the lines near my eyes or in waxy streaks along my occipital orbits.

definitely worth looking into.

she shouldn't need to fake it
diorshow mascara :: one of the neat advantages to buying a lot of cosmetics is that you occasionally reach into your purse and discover that you have a perfectly good, untested mascara still in the box. i'm quite sure that i bought this one because of the hype, because this mascara is supposedly the bomb when it comes to adding volume to your lashes.

let's be clear: i am a mascara aficionado. women wear mascara every day, but i am pretty damn vain about  my lashes, which means i pay an excessive amount of attention to what different mascaras do for a particular look and let me tell you, if they let me down, it's not pretty.

well, all that to say that pretty much the one thing i don't leave the house without [well, it happens, but not often] is a nice fringe of lashes. so i was pretty psyched to try out a formula that's supposed to be a be-all, end all when it comes to lash treatments. i was particularly curious about this one because it's known for adding volume. truth be told, my lashes are damn long and very curled on their own,  so mascaras that promise length and curl don't have as much resonance for me. but the fact is that i'm not going to sleep well knowing that there's a favourite mascara i haven't tried and this one just had to follow me home eventually. [in point of fact, that may be what happened, because i've no recollection of actually buying it.]

and so the verdict is a resounding... meh.

my lashes on diorshow
i found the thick wand was messy to work with, which in itself isn't off-putting because benefit's "bad gal lash", one of my all-time favourites, has a wand that's almost disgusting the first few times that you use it. so i'll forgive the various smears left around my eyes as i was trying to apply with some precision.

in seeking a formula that augmented volume, dior's product development team evidently forgot that, quite often, it's good to do nominal service to other concerns. this product did absolutely nothing for the length of my lashes, which is irritating when you're a dramatic lash girl trapped by light blonde eyelashes. after a couple of coats [with pauses to wipe of some excess], there was some visible improvement in volume, but the lashes themselves were only coated about three quarters of the way up. and there were dark smudges left behind.

after a few days, the formula seemed to become less clogged and easier to work with [i find that even
my lashes on ysl faux cils
"bad gal" can be tricky to work with out of a "virgin" tube], but it still only seemed to thicken the base of my lashes. rather than being a "dramatic" mascara, i would qualify this one as more of a basic, everyday sort of look. [unless you're me and your everyday look includes lashes that are flat-out intimidating.]

i have to say that this little exercise has left me a little perplexed as to dior's ultimate aim. i find that they're colour selections, while pretty, lack the dynamism that guerlain, chanel or ysl puts into theirs. on the more "technical" side, i find that ther verdict is decidedly mixed. would i choose to purchase the concealer again? yes, most likely. and the mascara? nope. i have bigger and better things to flutter at.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

making faces :: product review [mac "surf baby" collection]

surfer girl wants your brains...
if you've ever been listlessly flipping through the channels on a saturday afternoon, chances are you've come across one of those d-list movies from the sixties or seventies that tends to crop up when cable thinks nobody's looking. you immediately know when these films were made because they're all mounted against the stunning backdrop of california and because they all have this strangely "burnt" look, at once muddied and faded. [that's not just in your imagination, either. my resident film expert explains that in the post-techinicolour era, it took a while for people to get the hang of preserving films from oxidisation.] looking at mac's summer collection "surf baby", i'm reminded very much of that era. the colours, from the "zombie surfer" promo image to the products themselves, look like full-on summer brights that have been dirtied and muted just a little.

this isn't to say that the colours aren't bright- some of them very much are and i think that those who wait for summer to be able to pull out the colour stops will like what's on offer. but personally, i find that what works best about this collection is that the shades have a bit more dimension. i feel like this year's mac collections [especially in comparison with 2010] have left me wanting. none of them have inspired that childlike sense of wanting to play with the new crayons, but in this case, they really seemed to have returned to form.

i should mention that, as is generally the case with mac's summer collections, this one has a "colour" half and a "bronzing" half. the latter includes powder and cream bronzers and barely tinted lip balms, none of which are of any use to me. so there's a whole section that i'm not even going to touch on in this recap. i also didn't include reviews of the two eye liners and two nail polishes that are included, because i didn't really take the time to look at them. [that's not a negative review, either. in fact, they look very nice.] for my part, what i'm interested in is the colour part, which is in itself pretty massive. there are eye shadows, pigments [loose powders], a blush, lipsticks, glosses... all the usual staples represented and i think that there's something here to satisfy just about everybody. here's my rundown...

l to r :: bust out, hibiscus, swell baby, sun blonde, surf usa, saffron, my paradise



eye shadows
these are absolutely the standout of the collection. there seriously isn't a bad choice you could make, so whatever shade tickles your fancy, you won't be disappointed. eye shadows don't tend to sell out as fast as other limited items, but i have a feeling that these will move fairly quickly, particularly surf usa.

short shorts is a highlight shade, very similar to manila paper [spring colour forecast 2010, wonder woman 2011]. it's a warmed white colour that would look good on anyone and, while perhaps not unique, it's also the sort of shade that you're likely to reach for almost every day.

l to r :: ochre style [le], sun blonde, gorgeous gold, bright sunshine [pro]
sun blonde is a dirty mustard yellow. i don't think i've ever seen a shade like this, from mac or anyone else and i've heard several people describe it as being "so ugly it's beautiful". there's something to that description, because it's not the sort of shade that pops into anyone's mind when they're thinking of favourite colours and yellow as an eye shade is still something that gives most people a little trepidation, but i promise, it's surprisingly versatile. on warm complexions, it tends to emphasise golden tones, it really creates a nice contrast with blue eyes... it might not be everyone's first choice, but i actually think it's my favourite item in the collection.

surf usa is a teal colour that pulls very green. this is actually a nice break, because most teal shades lean more blue. the texture is super-satiny and it gives and incredible pop of colour. despite the incredible number of teal shades mac has released, this one really stands alone. as mentioned, i think this is going to be the biggest seller of the shadows.

l to r :: electric eel, blue calm [pro], surf usa, blue absinthe [l.e.], freshwater

l to r :: print, swell baby, copperplate
swell baby is a medium warm grey with a pearly sheen. one of the few areas where i find mac's colour selection has been lacking is in greys, so this one is really welcome. it's lighter than either print [cooler dark grey that i find applies unevenly and blends poorly] or copperplate [gorgeous warm matte grey with a very slight plum undertone], both of which are permanent shades. greys are popular for a reason- you can do virtually anything with them. this one is no exception and after a few serious misfires from mac in the grey department, this is really welcome.

saffron is a deep reddish orange that was originally released as part of the online only "mickey contractor" collection earlier this year. other than surf usa, i think that this will be the top selling shadow, because there were already a lot of people disappointed they missed it earlier in the year. it's another shade that just has no equal, either in mac's line [red brick is kind of similar but definitely redder and without the lovely satin sheen that saffron has] or anywhere else.

blush
my paradise: base color, mixed
last year, mac released a lovely pink and coral-red blush with a seahorse embossed called "marine life" with their summer collection and the resultant feeding frenzy was enough to frighten some well-trained navy seals. this year, they are evidently aiming for a repeat by offering a deep orange-peach blush with a thick, shimmery gold overlay [it doesn't go all the way through, but it's going to be part of the product for a good ten to fifteen uses at least] called "my paradise.

i don't think it's going to be quite the success of marine life, because the colour is less universally flattering, but i have no doubt that the blush will be a quick sell-through for them.

the base colour is decidedly warm, but on cooler skin [like mine], the peachier tones will tend to come out more. i did not find that it ran too warm for me at all and i like the fact that the shimmer, when you swirl everything together, appears more as a sheen than as gold flakes. it's a pretty shade that i think goes well with some of the other colours in the collection. is it a must have? probably not. but is it a distinctive shade that is worth owning? absolutely.

l to r :: marine life [l.e.- coral side], devil [pro], my paradise [base], my paradise [mixed], joie de vivre, bite of an apple [l.e.]
lipsticks
i'm not quite sure why mac chose to repromote "mocha" which is a permanent shade that was also included in the "mickey contractor" collection. someone seems to have decided that this is the year that mocha gets lots of love. on the other hand, you can get it all the time anywhere you buy mac. editorial shrug.

there are three new[ish] lipsticks being promoted with the collection, though.

hibiscus

l to r :: vegas volt, hibiscus, toxic tale [l.e.]
hibiscus is a bright red-toned coral that is going to be gone in the blink of an eye. it has a cremesheen finish, which gives it a nice blend of opaque coverage and satiny shine. it lasts pretty well, being a bright colour, but like most cremesheens, i find it has a bad tendency to bleed around the edges of the lips. it's been compared to cult favourite toxic tale, which is apt, but the two are very distinct. this shade is much more summery- not has dense/ opaque, softer overall- and it runs a little redder. i think it's a good shade for people who might have found toxic tale a little scary. because it's not totally opaque, your own lip colour is going to have more of an
effect on what it looks like. it pulled very red on me, whereas i've seen photos where the orange tones were a lot more pronounced.

bust out
bust out is this collection's medium purple. it seems like mac needs to include a purple shade in this range with every launch now. that doesn't really bother me, but i'm sort of hoping that this is the last take we'll have on this shade for a little while. and it would make a nice end point. it's a berry-toned purple with a slightly "dirty" grey-brown undertone to it. it doesn't turn magenta on my lips like some [style curve, quite the thing, spitfire], but it's not a blue-purple at all. i've heard it compared to the permanent shade "up the amp", which is a super-opaque deep mauve. although they look somewhat similar on the arm, on the lips they're very different. bust out is a lustre formula, which means that it isn't nearly as opaque and the colour of my lips has a pronounced effect on the appearance of the lipstick. definitely a good choice for purple-lovers, but passable for everyone else.

l to r :: style curve [l.e.], spitfire [l.e.], up the amp, bust out, quite the thing, play time [l.e.], rebel


naturally eccentric is a super-pale neutral colour that's strangely sheer. i say strangely because natural shades that are this pale tend to look very uneven if you can see the natural lip peeking through. the first time that i tried this, it looked awful and actually felt gritty. ew. i gave it a second shot and was careful to apply it lightly and i was surprised to find that it looked much nicer. i think it's a shade that will only work on cooler skin tones, but it's not bad for what it is. it's lighter than any of the permanent neutrals i've seen from mac.

lip glosses
i have to admit i gave these a pass, because i think they're the weak spot of the collection.

girl on board is a light, warm neutral that looks a lot like other shades mac has done in the last year [almondine, a quiet roar]- it's worth having if you don't have anything similar.

good lovin' is a light peachy shade that is even more ubiquitous and it's not a particularly great version of the shade- the permanent gloss "prrr" is much nicer.

strange potion is a bright peachy-coral that was a huge success with last year's "venomous villains" collection. i've heard it touted as universally flattering and it's the sort of shade that can go anywhere, so i'm not surprised at its popularity. it looks like a bad set of wax lips on me, which just goes to show that "universally flattering" is a term that just doesn't belong in discussions of colour.

krazy kahuna is a glossy, creamy reddish brown and is, to my mind, the lone standout. i passed, because it's incredibly similar to "temper tantra" released earlier this year [tt is a bit more red], but that's not a knock against the colour. if you missed temper tantra, or if you wear this shade often, this is a real winner.

pigments
i'll once again raise the eyebrow of ire in mac's direction for promoting two pigments from their permanent collection here. since they're charging more for items in limited edition packaging now, using permanently available shades has gone from being a bit lazy to unforgivable.

pigment-wise, though, this collection does feature two new "crushed metal stacks", a concept that mac first introduced with their spring colour forecast last year. basically, these are sets of four complementary shades [one with pinks, plum and taupe, the other with silver, mint, gold and navy] that interlock to form a nice little stack of loose powder fun.

the finishes for all shades are super-metallic and although the product appears chunky, it smoothes out very well, particularly when used with a little moisture. i didn't pick up either of the stacks, but they're definitely worthy of a look. i did get a sample of the gold shade [i wanted to try it out, since some pigments irritate my eyes] and i found it very easy to work with. this is the sort of cult favourite item that mac should be promoting with its special collections. so it kind of makes up for the permanent pigment shades.

as i said, i think that "surf baby" plays to a lot of mac's strengths, while moving away from the weaknesses that have been evident in a few of the recent launches. they've chosen to focus on what's worked for them before- a broad range of colours, returning some cult favourites and introducing a few sure-fire hits. they've chosen to steer clear of introducing new formulas [something which has been hit and miss for them this year] and it pays off.

the collection is available currently at all mac pro locations. it will be available for sale on line starting may 24th it is available now on line at www.maccosmetics.com and will be at all mac stores and counters starting may 26th in north america [international dates vary]. 

and finally, here's a couple of quick looks at the products in action. [you might have noticed that i haven't updated my "colour by letters" feature in a few days and this [well, this and guerlain] is why.



"hibiscus"
i started off by using the warmer shades from the collection, although these are normally a little outside my comfort range. i found, though, that the gold and orange tones really worked as a contrast with my blue eyes. such is the magic of the colour wheel. these shots are a little "odd" since two of them were taken with my phone [thanks dom!] and the other was in less-than-ideal morning light. it was sort of a busy day and sometimes a girl just doesn't have time to take photos of herself...

face ::
nars sheer glow foundation in mont blanc
christian dior hydrating concealer

eyes ::
manila paper e/s
sun blonde e/s
gorgeous gold e/s
saffron e/s
stacked crushed metal pigment gold
blacktrack fluidline eye liner
i get no kick eye liner 
false lashes mascara

cheeks ::
my paradise blush

lips ::
hibiscus l/s



"bust out"
this was my cool-toned take on the same collection, which i think shows the versatility of the products available. i will reiterate that these eye shadows are a dream to work with, even if you're working very quickly because you want to get a photo, finish your swatches, do your blog post and move on so that you can have a nap. it's a hard life being a blogger, let me tell you.

face ::

nars sheer glow foundation in mont blanc
christian dior hydrating concealer

eyes ::
inglot #351
surf usa e/s
swell baby e/s
blacktrack fluidline
i get no kick eye liner
ysl faux cils mascara

cheeks ::
overdyed blush

lips ::
bust out l/s

Sunday, May 15, 2011

making faces :: product review [mac "big bounce" shadows]

sheesh. with all the advance talk about these and the reviews from consumers, you'd think these shadows broke up someone's marriage. seriously, even the best products have their detractors, but i don't think that i have ever seen such universal distaste for something. i guess it's kind of reassuring to know that unanimity is still possible, even in the diversified world of the internet.

mac released these at the beginning of the month, along with a collection of coloured mascaras under the collection name "flighty". on the same day, they came out with a colour collection [one with no new products] called "fashion flower", which i reviewed previously. at the time of the launch, i'd already heard reviews of the new cream-mousse formula big bounce shadows that indicated that they weren't for me.

now, just to let you know where i'm coming from, i haven't used a cream shadow in about fifteen years. i don't like them as a rule, they tend to crease like crazy on my deep-set eyes and i dislike the sensation of having moist eyelids. so the negative reviews just reinforced what already made me skeptical. however, i got sample sizes of four of the colours and i figured, there are lots of things that i like even though a lot of other people hate them, so maybe i'll find out if there's a way i can make these work. the colours, after all, are simply gorgeous. mac really ran with these and released a whole palette of shades, even more than they did with their sumptuous "mega-metal" shadows that came out in january.

spread the wealth/ good fortune/ rich, sweet, luxury touch- direct light
i can understand their eagerness to get in on the market right away. in 2011, cream shadows went from being a niche product to "the new hotness", which meant that mac competitors nars, makeup forever and benefit had a serious advantage, since they already had cult favourite products on the market. on the high end, giorgio armani led the charge with their "eyes to kill" shadows, which are not creams but work more or less the same way and everyone else is now playing catch-up. guerlain has three cream shadows out with their summer collection and chanel apparently has some on deck for fall. so mac needed something that was new and they needed a good colour range to hold their own against those who already had a toe-hold.

ARE THE BIG BOUNCES REALLY THAT BAD? SEE THEM IN ACTION...



people seem to like cream shadows for two main reasons: they're quick to apply and their smooth consistency makes them relatively idiot-proof. you can swipe them on with a finger and go and they tend to be more even than powders. once they've set- usually within a few seconds- they stay put. also, bright colours are more intense in cream formula, so if you really want a pop, they're your best bet.

same as above, in indirect light
people hate cream shadows more or less for one reason: they crease. the moist product gets squished into the fine lines on your eyelids, which make it look like you're wearing a dingy horizontal blind as makeup. there's a reason benefit named their product "creaseless creams" to push them to the public.

so for mac's product to be successful, it would have to be quick and easy to apply, it would have to be relatively forgiving in application [without being unreasonable] and it would have to maintain an even colour [and a rich colour for darker and brighter shades] for several hours. on top of that, there are a couple of things that they would need not to do [i can't make that grammar sound good]: smudge and crease.

with that in mind, i proceeded to test out four shades:

good fortune :: a light pink champagne
spread the welath :: a medium metallic golden olive
luxury touch :: a rich purple-plum
rich, sweet :: a deep espresso brown with gold shimmer

from the start, i have to say that i was nervous. the texture of the shadows, described by mac as "spongy [and] mousse-like", is considerably wetter than regular cream shadows. they're about the consistency of yogurt- not the thick eastern european stuff, either- which seems counter-intuitive for a product that's supposed to last longer and wear better than regular cream shadows. but i figured i'd try them in a few different ways to see if i could find something that worked.

attempt #1 :: use 'em like a regular shadow

6 hours after application
5 minutes after application
i figured that a lot of people will just want them for the colour and will combine them with other shadows to create a full look. in this case, use applied "good fortune" lightly with a brush, it sheered out a lot and seemed disinclined to dry. i used two of mac's own mega-metal shadows, which are the ultimate in terms of blending and ease of use. however, it still looked kind of messy, because the cream shadow just wouldn't set, despite me leaving it a full minute. in order to get it anything close to dry, i had to give it a few seconds with the hair dryer. i did use a base [mac paint pot in painterly], but i have to say that the end result still looks like the before picture in a lesson on why you should use a base for your eye makeup. i tried adding a touch of eye liner- a liquid formula, because i could apply it with a lighter touch in case things still weren't absolutely dry- but that just seemed to make the cream shadow angry. within minutes the liner was so smudged you could barely tell it was there. the weird thing is that there really isn't that much difference between the way it looked after a few minutes and the way it looked several hours later when i took it off. that would be great, if it had looked good to begin with.

attempt #2 :: quick & dirty

5 hours after application
5 minutes after application
like i said, the main appeal of cream shadows is supposed to be their ease of use. endeavour #1 didn't seem very easy to me, but i figured that maybe i just wasn't using the shadows the way they were intended. so this time, i went with the simple approach.

having learned my lesson about liner, i started off with a paint pot base [augmented with a little inglot powder shadow for extra grip] once again, but i used one of mac's greasepaint sticks to get a dark, smudgy line around the eye, then i carefully, gently patted "rich, sweet" on my mobile lid, with the aim of doing a very quick, slightly smoky look that would allow me to go from no makeup to out the door in five minutes. the result?

ten minutes later i was still fidgeting with the eye shadow, had resorted to using a brush [smaller and firmer than the first time] and had something that looked worse than my first attempt. in the end, i had to call it quits [although the shadow still hadn't entirely dried] and live with something that was uneven and messy. a few hours later, the cream shadow had dissolved more or less to a dirty stain and i was left with a sort of muddy ring around my eyes, because the greasepaint stick, true to form, stayed put.

attempt #3 :: from the bottom up

5 minutes after application
so the last thing i could think of to do with a cream shadow was to use it as a base for other shadows. i do this anyway with a natural shade to even out the colour of my lids and to give a smooth surface for the makeup i'm applying. i still did that, but in this case, i layered "spread the wealth" over the base on my lid with a large, round, soft shadow brush. this brush on its own gave me smoother and more even coverage than anything i've tried so far, which is a plus. it did not help with the drying time, but since i knew what to do [close my eyes and wait], i managed to get it to dry much as i applied it.

i used a palette of greens [mac's photorealism quad- l.e. 2009] over the cream shadow and it definitely does seem to add a certain depth and warmthto the overall look. the thing is, i don't know that i'd spend $20 just to get this effect. it's nice, but it's not a real "wow" factor. these colours are lovely on their own and all this adds is a bit extra.

i will say that this is the only way that i was successful in using the big bounce shadows and since previous attempts indicate that there isn't a huge difference between what these look like freshly applied and what they look like hours later, i decided just to go with the "fresh" photo. used as anything other than a base, i'm afraid the big bounce are a big bust. the drying time means that they aren't quick to work with. the super-soft texture means that they're far from idiot-proof and, unless you apply a base underneath and a shadow over them, they start to migrate within minutes of application. sorry mac, i think you were so eager to get something into the cream shadow market that you rushed a deeply flawed product that'll come back to bite you.

note :: by day three, my right eye showed signs of irritation and was itchy and swollen in the corner. i can't say whether this was because of the shadows or not, since my eyes can be a little sensitive. nonetheless, i can't rule them out as a source of the irritation, so i felt i should mention it. 

here's a breakdown of the three looks that i did [realistically, i think the first two belong in the "hall of shame" from last week.]


"good fortune"
good fortune
i find that the sloppy eye here really lets down the side. the blush and lipstick are so pretty [guerlain rocks], but the shadow makes me look tired.

face ::
nars sheer glow foundation mont blanc
mac prolongwear concealer nw20

eyes ::
mac painterly paint pot [as base]
mac good fortune big bouncee/s
mac mating call mega-metal e/s
good fortune
mac noir plum mega-metal e/s
mac smoky heir superslick liquid liner
ysl faux cils mascara

cheeks ::
guerlain blush g

lips ::
guerlain cherry blossom rouge automatique





"rich, sweet"
rich, sweet
notice that, on the eyes closed shot, even though the focus is a little fuzzy, you can still see the unevenness of the cream shadow application.

face ::
nars sheer glow foundation mont blanc
mac prolongwear concealer nw20

eyes ::
mac painterly paint pot [as base]
inglot 351 e/s
mac french quarter greasepaint stick
mac rich, sweet big bounce e/s
rich, sweet
mac false lashes mascara

cheeks ::
nars deep throat blush
mac truth & light magically cool liquid powder

lips ::
mac red devil l/g





spread the wealth
"spread the wealth"
again, this is one that worked. i find you can the golden tone on the lid, but does that make the look that much better? a matter of personal preference, i guess. after the first two disasters, i eschewed liner on my upper lids, something i would normally not do, since i find liner makes my eyes pop. you can definitely see the irritated eye in the first shot.

face ::
gosh velvet touch foundation primer
nars sheer glow foundation mont blanc
dior diorskin nude skin perfecting hydrating concealer [trying this one out for a change]

eyes ::
mac sensibility e/s
spread the wealth
mac photorealism e/s
mac fresh approach e/s
mac image maker e/s
mac grey range e/s
mac mothbrown e/s
mac she who dares mineralize e/s [blue & green mixed as liner]
ysl faux cils mascara
mac smolder eye kohl

cheeks ::
mac dollymix blush

lips ::
mac true babe l/g