Being a nice normal Vampire I am still struggling over how to get publicity and suddenly I found out what I need is a FATWA
…………… not that easy what with being a vampire and female ……….. er …………. perhaps it is more of a problem being female ……….. Islam does not comment on vampires.
And females do not count …………. Well I do not have a male guardian ………..so in fact I do not exist ……………… Daddy is dead and having no husband or brother …….i am guardian less…………… hell I can do what I like !!!!!!!!
…… NOW why did someone not tell me sooner !!!! yee Godssssss what fantastic publicity ……………
Please have a riot over my blog …………… pleasessssssssss ……… pretty pleasessssssss …………..
This is the page that caused people to be killed in the name of Gods prophet………… clearly by people that could not read the holy book which says do not kill………..
So to join in I have asked my Niece to draw me a pic of the Islamic Prophet and here it is ……………….
MOHAMMAD
I know we are both female so not that important …………… but this is the likeness my niece drew so it has to be against some rule somewhere for even female to know how to draw ……………………
So lets have some riots ……………. Calls to ban my books …………….. look I can give you the ISBNs so that people know which of my books not to read ……and thousands will buy it to
1. Burn it
2. Read what all the fuss is about
So please try and ban me …………. How about a Fatwa ……….. just tell me how much more I have to poke fun at a religion to have one of my very own Religious judgement against me ………..
Fatwa against Pokémon
In 2001, religious authorities in the United Arab Emirates issued a fatawā indictment against the children's game Pokémon, after thinking that it encouraged gambling, and was based on the theory of evolution, "a Jewish-Darwinist theory, that conflicts with Islamic principles".[1]Fatwa against Salman Rushdie
(I will try and find a way to list his book for you to buy)
Main article: The Satanic Verses controversy
One of the first well-known fatwas was proclaimed in 1989 by the Iranian Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, against Salman Rushdie‘s novel The Satanic Verses. The argument related to an ostensibly blasphemous statement from an early biography of Prophet Muhammad, regarding incorporating pagan goddesses into Islam’s strongly monotheistic structure. Khomeini died shortly after issuing the fatwa. In 1998 Iran stated that it is no longer pursuing Rushdie’s death; however the decree was again reversed in early 2005 by the present theocrat, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.In 1991, Rushdie's Japanese translator, Hitoshi Igarashi, was stabbed and killed in Tokyo, and his Italian translator was beaten and stabbed in Milan. In 1993, Rushdie's Norwegian publisher William Nygaard was shot and severely injured in an attack outside his house in Oslo. Thirty-seven guests died when their hotel in Sivas, Turkey was burnt down by locals protesting against Aziz Nesin, Rushdie's Turkish translator.
Ok so I may not be Muslim but I do have lots of knowledge about that Deity ……….. well I am Western-Asian-Chinese …………… a real mouthful er…….. so break it down Chinese by looks but not born in china the same was as not all blacks you see were born in africa……………… Asian due to the fact I was born in Asia……….. Western due to the fact I was brought up in the US and UK after my perants died ………..
So with a horrendous worldwide extended family I have most religions in it somewhere ……….. er..apart from Scientoigists (we are not that mad) or Jews (so we are not out to take over the world)
……..But it does mean I have Muslim relatives so I know all about the difference between Hijabs and Nijabs without the problems of having ones hair fall out due to wearing them ……
And I have also seen what some women that wear the Burqa look like underneath ……… which is why I say that some should still stay covered up even in female company ………I will even add the passage myself to the holy book………. eating too many dates………….huh ….. eating too many camels more like it……….
Lots of cartoons of Mohammad …………………..
DETAILS OF THE CARTOONS
The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005. The newspaper announced that this publication was an attempt to contribute to the debate regarding criticism of Islam and self-censorship.
Danish Muslim organizations that objected to the depictions responded by holding public protests attempting to raise awareness of Jyllands-Posten's publication. Further examples of the cartoons were soon reprinted in newspapers in more than 50 other countries, further deepening the controversy.
This led to Islamic protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence with instances of firing on crowds of protestors (resulting in a total of more than 100 reported deaths),[1] including setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, storming European buildings, and burning the Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, French and German flags in Gaza City.[2][3] Various groups, primarily in the Western world, responded by endorsing the Danish policies, including "Buy Danish" campaigns and other displays of support. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen described the controversy as Denmark's worst international crisis since World War II.[4]
Critics of the cartoons described them as Islamophobic or racist,[5] and argued that they are blasphemous to people of the Muslim faith, are intended to humiliate a Danish minority, or are a manifestation of ignorance about the history of Western imperialism.
Supporters have said that the cartoons illustrated an important issue in a period of Islamic terrorism and that their publication is a legitimate exercise of the right of free speech, explicitly tied to the issue of self-censorship. They claim that Muslims were not targeted in a discriminatory way since unflattering cartoons about other religions (or their leaders) are frequently printed.[6] They question whether some of the riots were spontaneous outpourings as they took place where no spontaneous demonstrations are allowed, and whether the images of Muhammad per se are offensive to Muslims, as thousands of illustrations of Muhammad have appeared in books by and for Muslims.[7]